| Current Members Log-In | |
View Your Shopping Cart |
CRB Bookstore |
Markets Overview |
CRB Affiliates |
|
![]() |
| |
|
|
Publications |
|
|
|
|
By Brad Zigler Henry Ford's innovation democratized the automobile. But at a price. Ford was noted for saying, "People can have the Model T in any color-so long as it's black." Trading in index products used to be a limited choice proposition as well. First came index futures, then index options. More recently, index tracking stocks debuted. So, which is better? That depends on your risk tolerance, capitalization, and your profit objectives. A look at products based on the Nasdaq-100 index illustrates the point. Index NASDAQ-100 (NDX), representing 100 of the largest over-the-counter stocks, was set at an initial value of 250 in 1985. The index has been on a tear recently-advancing through the mid to upper 4,000-level. Products Nasdaq-100 futures-traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, under symbol 'ND'. Nasdaq-100 (cash) options-offered as 'NDX' on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. Nasdaq-100 shares-'QQQ', traded on the American Stock Exchange, are long term trust units initialized in 1999 with a base value of 100 approximating 1/20th of NDX; QQQ has since split 2:1. Nasdaq-100 share options-also traded on the American Stock Exchange using the base QQQ. Liquidity Traders are naturally attracted to more liquid markets. Liquidity signifies the facility by which you can enter and exit a trade close to the last sale price. Liquidity is made manifest in the metrics of volume, open interest, and spread. Volume, of course, is the total number of contracts or shares changing hands. Open interest, applicable only to derivatives contracts, represents outstanding contracts awaiting liquidation. And a spread is the difference between simultaneous bids and offers for an instrument, which can be reduced for comparison to a percentage of the total transaction value. A recent day's activity in Nasdaq-100 products paints the picture of relative liquidity shown in Table 1. Table 1
QQQ share volume, equivalent to 160,086 derivative contracts, clearly outdistances options and futures, as well as exhibiting the tightest apparent spread. NDX futures lead all the derivatives, while QQQ options outshine those based upon NDX. So does that mean you should trade QQQ shares? Maybe, but we haven't looked at the relative costs of establishing these positions yet. Capital Requirements Suppose you were bullish on Nasdaq-100, expecting a 10 percent rise over the next two weeks. Let's also suppose you're risk tolerant enough to use a leveraged position. How much out-of-pocket capital would you need to put on the table? We need to compare apples to apples here in risk/reward terms, so the option trade employed should be a synthetic long (a call purchase, financed with a put sale) rather than just an outright long call. We'll use the more liquid QQQ options for comparison in Table 2. Table 2
It's obvious the option trade requires the least amount of trading capital to initiate. Proof, however, is in the pudding. How would these positions perform if your expectation played out? Performance Modeling a 10 percent gain in Nasdaq-100 over two weeks at current volatility rates, could make your positions look like those in Table 3. Table 3
A mixed bag, isn't it? While options afford the lowest leveraged entry cost, they produce middling results when compared against futures and the cash shares. Still, a 40 percent return is nothing to sneeze at. But don't juggle your investment strategy on the basis of this cursory analysis alone. Each of the instruments we examined has a unique set of characteristics to bear in mind. NDX Futures The spread between the futures price and the cash index, known as basis, eventually dissipates over time. That's normally a drag on long futures positions going into the delivery month. In this example, however, we held basis constant. That may not be a realistic expectation. Keep in mind, too, that trading futures requires a commodities account, carried by a futures commission merchant (FCM). Your existing securities account won't do. So, if your brokerage firm isn't also an FCM, you'll have to go broker shopping. Futures positions, too, are marked-to-market daily in cash. Maintenance calls can be particularly unforgiving, since you'll be called to initial requirements, rather than to maintenance levels as in a securities account. Don't forget that you're dealing with a cash-settled index here-there's no physical delivery of securities. And, since these are futures, the position's short-lived. Liquidation of the position is inevitable on or before the delivery date. QQQ Options American style QQQ options can be exercised on any trading day, resulting in delivery of Nasdaq-100 shares. Covered strategies, like those of other equity options, are therefore permissible. Still, you'll need approval for naked option writing in your securities account to trade the synthetic long. At best, you can hope to avoid the position's margin requirement entirely if you have a free credit balance at least equal to the aggregate exercise price of the short put (220 x $100 = $22,000). Options, like futures, too are limited life instruments. You have only the time until expiration to see your market expectations realized or you must abandon your position. QQQ Shares Nasdaq-100 shares are the most forgiving of the instruments examined. If your objectives are not reached in the time you expect, you have the luxury of time to wait it out. The cost, of course, is the accrual of interest expense if you've bought on margin. There's no basis or time decay to contend with either, so trading this way requires less mathematical horsepower. Nor do QQQ shares require a special account. An existing securities brokerage account will suffice to trade the units, subject to margin account approval if leverage is to be employed or if short selling is anticipated. In the end, the best instrument to use depends entirely on you-your tolerance for risk, the capital available to you, and your minimum profit requirements. At least now you should be better prepared to make an informed investment decision. And as the Model T's inventor once said, "Before everything else, getting ready is the secret of success." Dr. Option (Brad Zigler) welcomes your questions. He can be reached at dr_option@hotmail.com. Any strategies discussed, including examples using actual securities and price data, are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are not to be construed as an endorsement, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities. The examples presented do not take into consideration commissions, tax implications or other transaction costs which may significantly affect the economic consequences of a given strategy. Options involve risk and are not for everyone.
CRB TRADER is published bi-monthly by Commodity Research Bureau, 330 South Wells Street, Suite 612, Chicago, IL 60606-7110. Copyright © 1934 - 2002 CRB. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any manner, without consent is prohibited. CRB believes the information contained in articles appearing in CRB TRADER is reliable and every effort is made to assure accuracy. Publisher disclaims responsibility for facts and opinions contained herein. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Copyright © 1934 - 2008 by Commodity Research Bureau - CRB. All Rights Reserved.
User agreement applies. Privacy policy. 330 South Wells Street Suite 612 Chicago, Illinois 60606-7110 USA Phone: 800.621.5271 or 312.554.8456 Fax: 312.939.4135 Email: info@crbtrader.com |
| Press Ctrl+D to bookmark this page - Set http://www.crbtrader.com as your Home Page |